|
Catalyst,
Volume 31, Issue 4: May 2004
"THE
PASSION" CONTINUES TO EXCITE
Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the
Christ" continues to be the source of controversy.
Attempts by three Jewish brothers in France to ban the
film did not succeed in court, but this did not stop the
Benlolo brothers—Patrick, Gerard and Jean-Marc—from
appealing the decision. The movie was censored in
Israel; it was the only nation in the world to ban the
film (Shapira Films, which has the Israeli distribution
rights, refused to release "The Passion").
For about a year now, critics of the
film have been saying it would spur violence against
Jews. Events have proven them wrong: two months after
the release of the movie, not one act of violence was
reported. It needs to be said that the movie's critics
were particularly certain that Jews would not escape
violence overseas. Indeed, Poland, France, Russia and
the Arab nations were cited over and over again as
places bound to witness pogroms. But not one act of
thuggery has occurred anywhere in the world.
It must also be said that those who made
these extravagant claims, including many prominent Jews,
have not apologized. They should. Recall that William
Donohue wrote to Abraham Foxman of the ADL requesting an
apology for his anti-Christian remark. Here is what
Foxman said: "[Gibson is] hawking it on a
commercial crusade to the churches of this
country." For Foxman, it is not secularists who are
the problem for Jews. Nor is it lax Christians. On the
contrary, it is those practicing Christians who are a
menace.
This is all rather strange given that it
was atheistic Nazism and atheistic Communism that
murdered Jews by the millions in the last century. And
today it is Muslim extremists who want to murder Jews.
Yet it is church-going Christians whom the ADL fears the
most. This is not only historically erroneous, it smacks
of a bias so deep as to be impervious to reason.
In an online survey of those who have
seen "The Passion," Regent University
professor William Brown found that 92 percent said the
movie made them think about their relationship with God;
and 90 percent said the movie gave them "a better
understanding of God's love toward mankind." Not
exactly the kind of sentiment we would expect from
people likely to punish Jews.
Then there is the survey by the
Institute for Jewish and Community Research (IJCR). In a
poll of 1,003 adults about the film, 83 percent said it
did not make them blame contemporary Jews for Christ's
death; only 2 percent said the film made them more
likely to hold today's Jews responsible; and 9 percent
said the film made them less likely to do so.
All of which shocked the president of
the IJCR, Gary Tobin: "I did not expect so many
people would say that, even if they believed Jews were
responsible for the death of Christ 2,000 years ago,
they don't hold Jews today responsible." Tobin also
said the movie "is clearly filled with anti-Semitic
views and images." It was for this reason, he said,
he "didn't expect people to have a more favorable
impression of Jews."
But if the movie was, in fact, so
"clearly filled with anti-Semitic views and
images," then why was this fact apparently lost on
those Christians who saw the movie? Of course, it is
entirely possible that Tobin's perception of what
constitutes anti-Semitism is so skewed as to create
problems for him that are not shared by others.
In any event, not only has the movie not
generated hate crimes against Jews, it has actually
motivated murderers, robbers and Nazis to confess to
their crimes.
Detectives in Texas say the death of a
19-year-old woman originally ruled a suicide has turned
into a murder case after a repentant man who watched the
movie confessed to killing her because she was carrying
his child. In Florida, a man who robbed a bank of
$25,000 in 2001 walked into the Palm Beach County
sheriff's office and confessed to his crime. The robber
told a detective that it was his emotional response to
the film that spurred him to surrender. And a Norwegian
neo-Nazi confessed to two bombings a decade ago after a
pang of repentance triggered by watching the movie. His
lawyer said, "The trigger that made him go to
police and confess was that movie."
So not only has "The Passion of the
Christ" not spawned violence against Jews, it has
served as a catalyst for contemporary Nazis to confess
to their crimes. Had there been any violence, it is a
sure bet the media would have broadcasted it all over
the world. But news stories on criminals who turned
themselves in after seeing the film were few and far
between.
The Catholic League is proud to have led
the fight in defense of Mel Gibson. That Mel appreciates
what we did cannot be understated: the conversations he
has had with Bill Donohue give evidence of his
gratitude.
|